Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 46 Download : 21

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyses the legal consequences of the transfer of undivided marital property on the validity of a sale and purchase deed made by a Land Deed Official (PPAT). The research focuses on the legal implications arising when one party in a marriage transfers joint property without the consent of the other spouse. Using a normative and empirical juridical approach, this paper examines statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and judicial precedents, including the Decision of the Banda Aceh Sharia Court No. 185/Pdt.G/2021/MS.Bna. The findings reveal that any transfer of joint property conducted without mutual consent violates Article 36 of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and Article 92 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), rendering the resulting PPAT deed legally invalid and void by law. Moreover, the PPAT may be held civilly, administratively, and ethically responsible for negligence in verifying the legal status of the property. This study highlights the importance of legal certainty and professional accountability in land registration and transfer processes to protect the rights of all parties involved.

Keywords

Land Deed Official Legal Certainty Legal Consequences Sale and Purchase Deed Invalid Deed

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Putri Safira, Darmawan, Novi Sriwahyuni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Safira, P., Darmawan, & Sriwahyuni, N. (2025). Legal Consequences of the Transfer of Undivided Joint Property on the Validity of the Deed Made by the Land Deed Official (PPAT). Genesis Law and Social Sciences, 1(2), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.61975/glass.v1i2.99
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Firdawaty L. Filosofi pembagian harta bersama. ASAS 2016;8. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v8i1.1227.
  2. Rajafi A. Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia: dari Orde Lama hingga Orde Reformasi. vol. 14. 2017. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v14i2.2059.
  3. Nomor U-U. tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan n.d.
  4. Harahap MY. Kedudukan kewenangan dan acara peradilan agama UU No. 7 tahun 1989 Edisi Kedua 2003.
  5. Sriono S. Hukum Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia 2023.
  6. Manan A. Aneka masalah hukum perdata Islam di Indonesia 2006.
  7. Rosida UH, SH M, Baiq Ismiati SEI, MH M, Umi Salamah MHI, Tauvani AY, et al. Pengantar Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Edu Publisher; 2021.
  8. Syah IM. Pencaharian Bersama suami isteri di Aceh ditinjau dari sudut UU Perkawinan Tahun 1974 dan Hukum Islam. PhD Diss, Universitas Sumatera Utara 1984.
  9. Perangin E. Praktek Jual Beli Tanah. Rajawali Pers; 1987.
  10. Istanti I, Khisni A. Akibat Hukum Dari Akta Jual Beli Tanah Dihadapan Ppat Yang Dibuat Tidak Sesuai Dengan Prosedur Pembuatan Akta Ppat. Jurnal Akta 2017;4:271–82. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i2.1797.
  11. Kelib A. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Berdasar Instruksi Presiden No. 1 Tahun 1991 Dalam Tata Hukum Nasional 1993.
  12. Amiri KS. Perkembangan dan problematika hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law 2021;1:50–8. https://doi.org/10.30984/jifl.v1i1.1639.
  13. Rachman A, Thalib P, Muhtar S. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata, Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Administrasi. Prenada Media Group; 2020.
  14. Hartanto JA. Hukum harta kekayaan perkawinan: menurut Burgerlijk Wetboek dan undang undang perkawinan. Laksbang Pressindo; 2017.
  15. Jonaedi Efendi SHI, Johnny Ibrahim. Metode penelitian hukum: normatif dan empiris. Prenada Media; 2018.
  16. Mukti Fajar ND, Achmad Y. Dualisme penelitian hukum: normatif & empiris. Pustaka pelajar; 2010.
  17. Engel C. Empirical methods for the law. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 2018:5–23.
  18. Booth A, Martyn-St James M, Clowes M, Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review 2021.
  19. Oomen B, Bedner A. The Relevance of Real Legal Certainty–An Introduction. REAL LEGAL CERTAINTY AND ITS RELEVANCE 2018:9.
  20. Ramadhani R. Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Yang Terkandung Dalam Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2017;2:139–57. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v2i1.1144.
  21. Satrio J. Hukum waris tentang pemisahan boedel. Citra Aditya Bakti; 1998.