Main Article Content

Abstract

The rise of Society 5.0 has driven significant technological transformations across various sectors, necessitating the adaptation of traditional legal principles to contemporary digital practices. This study examines the reinterpretation of the principle Tabellionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo in Indonesia’s notarial practice within the digital context of Society 5.0. Employing a normative juridical approach, the research explores how emerging digital technologies, including electronic signatures, teleconferencing, blockchain, and biometric authentication, can fulfill traditional legal requirements of authenticity, integrity, and physical presence in notarial acts. Although Indonesia’s current legal framework poses challenges to fully digital implementations, the analysis suggests that adaptive regulatory reforms could enable a hybrid notarial model. Such a model integrates traditional safeguards with technological innovations, enhancing legal certainty, accessibility, and inclusivity. Ultimately, this research advocates regulatory updates that maintain core notarial values while meeting modern societal expectations for efficient, trustworthy, and accessible legal services.

Keywords

Digital notary Tabellionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo Society 5.0 Notary 5.0

Article Details

How to Cite
Idroes, G. M. (2025). Reinterpreting the Principle of Tabellionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo in Notarial Practice in the Digital Era of Society 5.0. Genesis Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.61975/glass.v1i1.82

References

  1. Härmand K. Digitalisation before and after the Covid-19 crisis. ERA Forum 2021;22:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-021-00656-8.
  2. Putra FMK. Characteristics of Notary Deeds for Transactions Through Electronic Media. Norma 2021;17:1–14. http://doi.org/10.30742/nlj.v17i3.1091.
  3. Lubis I, Siregar T, Lubis DIS. The Principle of Tabellionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo Related To Cyber Notary. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 2023;3:422–33. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i06.028.
  4. Alincia D, Sitabuana TH. Urgency of Law Amendment as Foundation of The Implementation of Cyber Notary. vol. 17. Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2021. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41749.
  5. Delafare MW, Suhartono S, Prasetyawati E. Legal Protection for Notary That Doesn’t Attach Letter and Document to Minuta Deed. vol. 11. Фонд поддержки академических инициатив; 2023.
  6. Lubis I, Murwadji T, Sunarmi S, Sukarja D. Cyber Notary as A Mean of Indonesian Economic Law Development. 2023. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1972.pp62-72.
  7. Marzuki PM. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi 2005. Kencana, Jakarta 2014.
  8. Wajdi F, Kodiyat BA, Lubis TH. An Analysis of the Indonesian Government Policy on the Lockdown from the perspective of Human Rights. 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020), Atlantis Press; 2021, p. 418–25. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210506.055.
  9. Jonaedi Efendi SHI, Johnny Ibrahim SH, Se MM. Metode penelitian hukum: normatif dan empiris. Prenada Media; 2018.
  10. Järvinen M, Mik-Meyer N. Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches for the social sciences. Sage; 2020.
  11. Khoa BT, Hung BP, Brahmi MH. Qualitative research in social sciences: data collection, data analysis and report writing. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 2023;12:187–209. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpspm.2023.132247.
  12. Anggraeni D, Mahmudah S. Urgensi Peningkatan Peran Notaris Melalui Implementasi Konsep Cyber Notary dalam Pembuatan Akta di Era Cyber Society 5.0. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 2023;5:2307–20. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3870.
  13. Adjie H. Konsep Notaris Mayantara Menghadapi Tantangan Persaingan Global. Jurnal Hukum Respublica 2017;16:201–18.
  14. Saraswati PS, Susrama IN. Cyber Notary Juridical Review in the Legal System in Indonesia. vol. 11. Фонд поддержки академических инициатив; 2023.
  15. Iqbal M. Kepastian Hukum Akta E-RUPS yang dibuat Notaris Menurut Asas Tabellionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 2022;11:81–91. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i1.1729.
  16. Wahyuni E, Rahman S, Risma A. Keabsahan Digital Signature/Tanda tangan Elektronik Dinjau Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata dan UU ITE. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) 2022;3:1082–98.
  17. Nirmalapurie NA, Arsin FX. The Use of Electronic Signatures and Seals in Notarial Deeds According to the Principle of Tablelionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo. LEGAL BRIEF 2022;11:1440–5.
  18. jolt.richmond.edu/2021/10/27/remote-online-notarization-the-future-of-real-estate-closings/ n.d. https://jolt.richmond.edu/2021/10/27/remote-online-notarization-the-future-of-real-estate-closings/ (accessed April 23, 2025).
  19. Rahmatullah B, Artanty CA, Muharman D. Konsep Cyber Notary Dalam Perspektif Asas Tabellionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP) 2024;7:10114–23.
  20. Kie TT. Studi Notaris dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris, Jakarta, PT. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve 2011.
  21. Lekkas D, Gritzalis D. Cumulative notarization for long-term preservation of digital signatures. vol. 23. Elsevier; 2004.
  22. Wesna PAS, Putra KFS. Legality Notary Deed using cyber notary documents as evidence in the principle of the tabellionis officium fideliter exercebo 2023. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2023.4.4.781-789.