Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 259 Download : 134

Main Article Content

Abstract

As judicial systems increasingly adopt digital technologies, Indonesia’s Supreme Court has introduced e-litigation to streamline court procedures, including the presentation of electronic evidence in civil cases. This study investigates how electronic evidence is implemented at the Banda Aceh District Court, based on Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019. The regulation requires parties to submit documentary evidence through an e-court system and permits the examination of witnesses or experts via teleconference. Although the implementation complies with legal provisions, it faces several challenges. These include a lack of detailed procedural guidance, leading to legal uncertainty, and practical issues such as unreliable internet connectivity and limited user familiarity with digital systems. In response, the court has undertaken efforts such as upgrading network infrastructure and conducting training programs. The study concludes by recommending clearer procedural standards and enhanced technological and human resource support to improve the effectiveness of electronic evidence presentation in civil proceedings.

Keywords

Electronic evidence Civil trial E-Litigation E-court Judicial reform

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muzammil Siddiqi, Ilyas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Siddiqi, M., & Ilyas, I. (2025). The Implementation of Electronic Evidence Presentation in Civil Proceedings. Genesis Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.61975/glass.v1i1.78
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Zuhriah E. Peradilan Agama Indonesia: Sejarah, Konsep, dan Praktik di Pengadilan Agama. Setara Press; 2014.
  2. Setiawan AD, Putri SA. Implementasi Sistem E-Court Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran 2021;2:198–217. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v2i2.352.
  3. Susanto MI, Supriyatna W. Creating an Efficient Justice System with E-Court System in State Court and Religious Court of Rights. International Journal of Arts and Social Science 2020;3:354–61.
  4. Ahmed RK, Muhammed KH, Pappel I, Draheim D. Impact of E-Court Systems Implementation: a Case Study. Vol. 15. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2020-0008.
  5. Fauzan A, Diniyanto A, Hamid A. Regulation Arrangement through The Judicial Power: The Challenges of Adding the Authority of The Constitutional Court and The Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Legal Reform 2022;3:403–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i3.58317.
  6. Mulkan H, Addink H, Saraya S, Santoso AB. Legality of E-Court in the Legal Reform towards a Judicial System with Legal Certainty. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum n.d.;11:605–23. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2966095.
  7. Harahap MY. Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali 2002.
  8. Latifiani D, Widyawati A, Fibrianti N, Ningsih AS. Advocate as Law Enforcer in the implementation of e-court. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 2020;11.
  9. Guo M. Internet court’s challenges and future in China. vol. 40. Elsevier; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105522.
  10. Al-Shaibani MN. Remote Litigation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. vol. 17. 2022.
  11. Lumbanraja AD. Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan Online di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Crepido 2020;2:46–58. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.2.1.46-58.
  12. Gerry M, Rizkiana RE. Good Governance Implementation by PERMA 1/2019 in Letter Evidence Submission Regulation For E-Litigation Cases. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence 2023;4:47–64. https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v4i1.68121.
  13. Ramdani R, Mayaningsih D. Urgensi Persidangan Secara Elektronik (E-Litigasi) dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama di Era Digitalisasi. Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam 2021;2:219–36.
  14. Schotel B. Legislation, Empirical Research and Juridical Law. vol. 1. Taylor & Francis; 2013. https://doi.org/10.5235/2050-8840.1.3.501.
  15. Engel C. Empirical Methods for the Law. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 2018:5–23.
  16. Waluyo B. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek 2008.
  17. Knott E, Rao AH, Summers K, Teeger C. Interviews in the Social Sciences. vol. 2. Nature Publishing Group UK London; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6.
  18. Khan TH, MacEachen E. An Alternative Method of Interviewing: Critical Reflections on Videoconference Interviews for Qualitative Data Collection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2022;21:16094069221090063. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090063.