Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2 Download : 1

Main Article Content

Abstract

The development of infrastructure for public interest requires land acquisition based on the principles of justice, legal certainty, and utility as stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest Development, which includes the principles of humanity, justice, utility, certainty, openness, agreement, participation, welfare, sustainability, and harmony. However, in practice, the implementation of compensation still poses problems, especially regarding the discrepancy between the compensation value and the real market conditions. This is evident in the construction of the Krueng Baro Bridge in South Aceh, where there are discrepancies in land value and public dissatisfaction with the determined value. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of compensation payments for land rights in the construction of the Krueng Baroe Bridge in South Aceh. The research method used is empirical juridical with a sociological legal approach, data obtained thru interviews with the Commitment-Making Officer, the National Land Agency, the Public Appraisal Service Office, as well as the affected community, and reinforced with literature study. The research results show that formally, the implementation of compensation has followed legal procedures, but the execution has not fully reflected substantive justice, as public consultations were not conducted and non-physical losses were not accommodated in the determination of compensation value. The obstacles that arise are multidimensional, including limited land data, weak institutional integration, and low transparency. The resolution efforts that have been undertaken include deliberations and renegotiations between the implementing parties, KJPP, and the community that rejects the compensation.

Keywords

Compensation payments Land rights Bridge construction South Aceh Land acquisition

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Cut Tiya Ascasari, Ilyas Ismail, Siti Rahmah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ascasari, C. T., Ismail, I., & Rahmah, S. (2026). Compensation Payments for Land Rights in the Construction of the Krueng Baroe Bridge in South Aceh. Genesis Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.61975/glass.v2i1.125
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Tamo WMT, Waongan A, Roeroe S. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Ganti Rugi Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Lex Crimen 2022;11.
  2. Aziz M. Land Acquisition, Land Rights, and Consignment: A Policy Framework for Legal Certainty and Social Justice in National Development. Journal of Social Science Studies 2023;3:281–94.
  3. Putri D, Silviana A. Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab PPAT dalam Proses Pembebasahan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2025;9:588–98. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v9i3.11784.
  4. Simamora B. Implementation of Regulation Number 2 of 2012 on Land Acquisition for Development. vol. 175, IOP Publishing; 2018, p. 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012069.
  5. Nurnaningsih N. Legal Interpretation of Regulation Law No. 2 of 2012 Concerning Land Acquisition for Development in The Public Interest. Veteran Law Review 2023;6:70–84. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6iSpecialIssues.5761.
  6. Melo I, Pijoh FE. The Impact of Legal Land Acquisition for Public Interest, Atlantis Press; 2020, p. 206–10. https://doi.org/ 10.2991/assehr.k.201014.045.
  7. Guild J. Land Acquisition in Indonesia and Law No. 2 of 2012. ADBI Working Paper Series; 2019.
  8. Engel C. Empirical Methods for The Law. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 2018:5–23.
  9. Soekanto S. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. 2006.
  10. Podgorecki A. Pendekatan Sosiologis Terhadap Hukum 1987.
  11. Jonaedi Efendi SHI, Johnny Ibrahim SH, Se MM. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media; 2018.
  12. Ali Z. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika; 2021.
  13. Mezak MH. Jenis, Metode dan Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian hukum 2006.
  14. Knott E, Rao AH, Summers K, Teeger C. Interviews in the Social Sciences. vol. 2. Nature Publishing Group UK London; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6.
  15. Mitchell M. Analyzing the Law Qualitatively. Qualitative Research Journal 2022;23:102–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2022-0061.
  16. Mertokusumo S. Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty 1999.
  17. Abi Putra N. The Urgency of Land Administration Accuracy by The National Land Agency to Minimize Land Disputes. Awang Long Law Review 2026;8:608–15. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i2.1887.
  18. Wowor F. Fungsi Badan Pertanahan Nasional Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah. Lex Privatum 2014;2:156963.
  19. Jannah SM, Fanciska W, Mau HA. Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Ganti Rugi Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah 2025;2:485–96. https://doi.org/10.62335/cendekia.v2i3.1061.
  20. Rahmah S, Jalil H, Kadir MYA. Legal Dilemma for Land Deed Officials in Transferring Land Title Within Agrarian Reform in Indonesia: A Study in Aceh Province. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 2024;8:556–78. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.16898.
  21. Adjie H. Hukum notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris 2014.