Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 64 Download : 4

Main Article Content

Abstract

Notaries play an important role in the Indonesian legal system, but the Notary Law does not regulate the dismissal of a Notary due to bankruptcy. This ambiguity gives rise to multiple legal interpretations regarding whether a Notary appointed by the State can be dishonorably dismissed in the context of bankruptcy. This study aims to analyze the interpretation of the dismissal of a Notary who is declared bankrupt and its legal consequences for the Notary's authority. The method used is normative juridical legal research with a conceptual, legislative, and analytical approach. The study results indicate that the provisions in Article 9 paragraph (1) and Article 12 letter a of the Notary Law give rise to legal uncertainty and are contrary to the principle of justice because bankruptcy is a civil matter and is not always related to violations of job ethics. This study suggests revising and eliminating these articles to overcome multiple interpretations, ensure fair legal protection for Notaries, and maintain the dignity of the Notary's position in the Indonesian legal system.

Keywords

Notary public Bankruptcy Legal certainty Public officials dismissal Notarial law

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Fajri Yandi, Teuku Abdurrahman, Sri Walny Rahayu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Yandi, F., Abdurrahman, T., & Rahayu, S. W. (2025). Analysis of Notaries As Public Officials Who Have Been Declared Bankrupt from the Perspective of Notarial Law. Genesis Law and Social Sciences, 1(2), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.61975/glass.v1i2.89
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Hazmi RM, Jahar AS, Adhha N. Construction of Justice, Certainty, and Legal Use in the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018. Jurnal Cita Hukum 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i1.11583.
  2. Victoria OA, Ariyana AR. Policy Analysis Study of the Traffic Accident of Criminal System Which Make Loss of Life. International Journal of Law Reconstruction 2020;4:136. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v4i2.11382.
  3. Ilo BO. Functions Theories and Practice of Administrative Law in Contemporary Governance. Administrative and Environmental Law Review 2022;3:51–64. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i1.2492.
  4. Utarid WOR. Legal Consequence Towards An Authentic Act That Was Not Ready By Notary And Not Signed Jointly By The Parties Based On Law Of Notary. International Journal of Latin Notary 2023;4. https://doi.org/10.61968/journal.v4i1.57.
  5. Effendy Jaraputri RAP, Rahayu SW, Din Mohd, Ghifari MS. Legal Consequences for a Notary Public With Double Professions as a Rector of a Private University Based on Law on Office of Notary Public. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 2023;23:25–35. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v23i1.8611.
  6. Ananda R, Rohaini R, Nurhasanah S, Sunaryo S. The Role of the Notary Regional Supervisory Board in Responding to Violations of Notary Duties and Positions. Indonesia Private Law Review 2022;3:97–106. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v3i2.2684.
  7. Nathanael M, Djaja B, Sudirman M. Legal Consequences of Authentic Deed With False Identity Against Notary. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 2024;4:2576–83. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.838.
  8. Adjie H. Legal Study Regarding the Responsibilities of Notaries in Providing Social Services in Accordance With the Implementation of Their Position. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 2023;11:e1435. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i8.1435.
  9. Supriyadi S, Handoko W. Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Notaris Selaku Pejabat Formal. Notarius 2023;16:126–40. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.39498.
  10. Wiryawan AW. Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Notaris Yang Dinyatakan Pailit Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Lex Renaissance 2020;5. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art12.
  11. Maharani CL, Susanti DO, Ali M. Pengampuan Sebagai Dasar Pemberhentian Sementara Dari Jabatan Notaris. Syntax Idea 2022;4:50–66. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v4i1.1712.
  12. Putri NA. Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Jabatan Notaris Yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 2024;7:1052–60. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i2.1290.
  13. Hamda TZY, Rinaldi Y, Abdurrahman T. The Legal Authority of Natory Toward Document Confidential of the Parties Other Than Notary Protocol. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 2021;6:189. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v6i2.299.
  14. Deen T, Victoria OA, Sumain S. Public Notary Services in Malaysia. Jurnal Akta 2018;5:1017. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i4.4135.
  15. Maylaksita A. Problematik Interpretasi Pengaturan Kepailitan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance 2019;4. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss1.art7.
  16. Haliti-Mustafa E, Morina S, Mustafa V. The Role of Notaries in a Modern Legal System in the Western Balkans. Corporate Law and Governance Review 2024;6:37–42. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv6i3p4.
  17. Aulia Raihan, Selamat Widodo. Analysis of Dismissal of Bankrupt Notary Positions Based on Notary Office Law and Bankruptcy Law. Journal Equitable 2024;9:18–37. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v9i1.6377.
  18. Pambudi AIC, Tanuwijaya F, Setyawan F. Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Pemberhentian Notaris Akibat Dinyatakan Pailit. MIMBAR YUSTITIA 2022;6:33–53. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v6i1.3187.
  19. Basyarudin B. The Evolution and Significance of Notarial Law in Modern Legal Systems. Law and Business 2024;4:39–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/law-2024-0002.
  20. Fajar M, Achmad Y. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris, Cetakan IV. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar 2017;280.
  21. Jonaedi Efendi SHI, Johnny Ibrahim SH, Se MM. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris. Prenada Media; 2018.
  22. Marzuki M. Penelitian Hukum: edisi revisi. Prenada Media; 2017.
  23. Savarina AA, Badriyah SM. The Authority of a Notary Who Is Declared Bankrupt Against the Validity of the Deed That Has Been Made. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 2025;5:18. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i1.2426.