Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 137 Download : 79

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The manufacturing sector in Batam faces increasing pressure from rising energy costs and operational inefficiencies. This study investigates how integrating risk management frameworks, specifically ISO 31000 and FMEA, can enhance energy efficiency in manufacturing operations. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative analysis of energy consumption data from selected firms with qualitative insights from interviews with key industrial stakeholders. Baseline energy performance was established, and operational risks were assessed and prioritized. Findings show that outdated machinery, poor maintenance, and unplanned downtimes significantly contributed to energy inefficiency. Implementation of risk-based interventions led to measurable improvements in energy use and cost reduction. Firms adopting the integrated approach reported that 15% energy saving in PT X results in operational cost savings of $ 29.994, and 10% energy saving in PT Y results in operational cost savings of $ 23.952. The Return on Investment (ROI) from implementing an integrated energy risk management strategy is estimated to reach 18 months to 20 months, based on reduced energy consumption and increased productivity. The study underscores the importance of tailored risk-energy frameworks in industrial settings and suggests avenues for future research in broader contexts.

Keywords

Industrial energy management Risk-based decision making Sustainability strategy ISO 31000 application FMEA implementation Manufacturing process efficiency

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ayub Timba, Erkata Yandri, Omrie Ludji, Rendy Sidharta, Clizardo Amaral, Ratna Ariati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Timba, A., Yandri, E., Ludji, O., Sidharta, R., Amaral, C., & Ariati, R. (2025). Integrated Risk Management for Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of Batam’s Manufacturing Sector. Grimsa Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.61975/gjset.v3i2.87
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Zografopoulos I, Ospina J, Liu X, Konstantinou C. Cyber-Physical Energy Systems Security: Threat Modeling, Risk Assessment, Resources, Metrics, and Case Studies. IEEE Access 2021;9:29775–818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058403.
  2. Shabalov MY, Zhukovskiy YL, Buldysko AD, Gil B, Starshaia V V. The influence of technological changes in energy efficiency on the infrastructure deterioration in the energy sector. Energy Reports 2021;7:2664–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.05.001.
  3. Abbasi M, Abbasi E, Li L, Aguilera RP, Lu D, Wang F. Review on the Microgrid Concept, Structures, Components, Communication Systems, and Control Methods. Energies 2023;16. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010484.
  4. Zahraoui Y, Alhamrouni I, Mekhilef S, Reyasudin Basir Khan M, Seyedmahmoudian M, Stojcevski A, et al. Energy management system in microgrids: A comprehensive review. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2021;13:1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910492.
  5. Raimi D, Campbell E, Newell R, Prest B, Villanueva S, Wingenroth J. Global Energy Outlook 2022 : Turning Points and Tension in the Energy Transition 2022.
  6. Pasman H, Sripaul E, Khan F, Fabiano B. Energy transition technology comes with new process safety challenges and risks. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2023;177:765–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.036.
  7. Idroes GM, Hardi I, Noviandy TR, Sasmita NR, Hilal IS, Kusumo F, et al. A Deep Dive into Indonesia’s CO2 Emissions: The Role of Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Natural Disasters. Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics 2023;1:69–81. https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v1i2.115.
  8. Zhang H, Ma Y, Yuan K, Khayatnezhad M, Ghadimi N. Efficient design of energy microgrid management system: A promoted Remora optimization algorithm-based approach. Heliyon 2024;10:e23394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23394.
  9. Rawa M, Abusorrah A, Al-Turki Y, Sindi H, Bassi H, Mostafa MH. Efficient energy management framework for enhancing the techno-economic-environmental performance of grid-connected microgrids under uncertain conditions. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 2024;15:102336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102336.
  10. Yuan S, Reniers G, Yang M, Bai Y. Cost-effective maintenance of safety and security barriers in the chemical process industries via genetic algorithm. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2023;170:356–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.008.
  11. Trinks A, Mulder M, Scholtens B. An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance. Ecological Economics 2020;175:106632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106632.
  12. Elkhatat A, Al-Muhtaseb S. Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability. Energies 2024;17. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133179.
  13. Saiful R, Yandri E, Hilmi E, Nasrullah N, Uhanto U, Fitriani F. Optimizing Motorcycle Manufacturing Sustainability through the Integration of Waste Heat Recovery and Metal Scrap Recycling : A Process Engineering Approach 2024;2:75–85. https://doi.org/10.60084/ljes.v2i2.225.
  14. Wu Z, Liu W. Literature review and prospect of the development and application of FMEA in manufacturing industry 2021:1409–36.
  15. Yandri E, Ariati R, Saepul Uyun A, Hendroko Setyobudi R, Susanto H, Abdullah K, et al. Potential Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Applications in a Small Industrial Laundry: A Practical Study of Energy Audit. E3S Web of Conferences 2020;190. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019000008.
  16. Zhao Y, He Y, Zhou D, Zhang A, Han X, Li Y, et al. Functional risk-oriented integrated preventive maintenance considering product quality loss for multistate manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research 2021;59:1003–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1713416.
  17. Khodadadi A, Adinehpour S, Sepehrzad R, Al-Durra A, Anvari-Moghaddam A. Data-Driven Hierarchical Energy Management in Multi-Integrated Energy Systems Considering Integrated Demand Response Programs and Energy Storage System Participation based on MADRL Approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 2024;103:105264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105264.
  18. Gul M, Yucesan M, Celik E. A manufacturing failure mode and effect analysis based on fuzzy and probabilistic risk analysis. Applied Soft Computing Journal 2020;96:106689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106689.
  19. Park J, Park C, Ahn S. Assessment of structural risks using the fuzzy weighted Euclidean FMEA and block diagram analysis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2018;99:2071–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1844-x.
  20. Abba ZYI, Balta-Ozkan N, Hart P. A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022;160:112305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112305.
  21. Ibn Batouta K, Aouhassi S, Mansouri K. Energy efficiency in the manufacturing industry — A tertiary review and a conceptual knowledge-based framework. Energy Reports 2023;9:4635–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.03.107.
  22. Ferreira de Araújo Lima P, Crema M, Verbano C. Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. European Management Journal 2020;38:78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005.
  23. Diva Adisti, Tanti Novianti, Suwarsinah HK. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Risk Management of PT XYZ Indonesia (ESG Disclosure Approach 2023). Business Review and Case Studies 2024;5:498. https://doi.org/10.17358/brcs.5.3.498.
  24. de Oliveira UR, Brasil TF, Aprigliano V, Santos CR dos, Lima GBA. Evaluation of ISO 31010 Techniques for Supply Chain Risk Management in Automotive Suppliers. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084169.
  25. Muthmainnah S, Immawan T. Failure Risk Analysis of SMEs based on ISO 31000. Teknoin 2023;28:1–13. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknoin.vol28.iss2.art1.
  26. Lalonde C, Boiral O. Managing risks through ISO 31000: A critical analysis. Risk Management 2012;14:272–300. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2012.9.
  27. Organizations C. A Systematic Review of Risk Management Methodologies for 2023:1–19.
  28. Systems G. in Mechanical Engineering Evaluating Hybrid Renewable Energy Solutions for Residential Power in Iceland A Comparative Study of Diesel and Grid-Connected Systems 2024.
  29. Butt J. A strategic roadmap for the manufacturing industry to implement industry 4.0. Designs 2020;4:1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs4020011.
  30. Stefana E, Ustolin F, Paltrinieri N. IMPROSafety: A risk-based framework to integrate occupational and process safety. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2022;75:104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104698.
  31. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations. Enterprise Risk Management Integrating with strategy and performance. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 2017;I:16.
  32. Dwiasnati S, Hidayat RR. Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Menggunakan COSO: Enterprise Risk Management Framework Integrated Pada PT ALPHANET. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Kerangka Kerja Teknologi Informasi 2022;8:66–72. https://doi.org/10.34010/jtk3ti.v8i2.7845.
  33. Uhanto U, Yandri E, Hilmi E, Saiful R, Hamja N. Predictive Maintenance with Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Wind Turbines and PV Power Plants. Heca Journal of Applied Sciences 2024;2:87–98. https://doi.org/10.60084/hjas.v2i2.219.
  34. Schulte J, Knuts S. Sustainability impact and effects analysis - A risk management tool for sustainable product development. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022;30:737–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.004.
  35. Wren B. Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion Industry: A comparative study of current efforts and best practices to address the climate crisis. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain 2022;4:100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100032.
  36. Gurtu A. Supply Chain Risk Management : Literature Review 2021:1–16.
  37. Efe A. A Comparison of Key Risk Management Frameworks: COSO-ERM, NIST RMF, ISO 31.000, COBIT. Journal of Auditing and Assurance Services 2023;3:185–205.
  38. Ispas L, Mironeasa C, Silvestri A. Risk-Based Approach in the Implementation of Integrated Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023;15:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310251.
  39. Dai Y, Preece R, Panteli M. Risk assessment of cascading failures in power systems with increasing wind penetration. Electric Power Systems Research 2022;211:108392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108392.
  40. Niza IL, Luz IM da, Bueno AM, Broday EE. Thermal Comfort and Energy Efficiency: Challenges, Barriers, and Step towards Sustainability. Smart Cities 2022;5:1721–41. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5040086.
  41. Jalo N, Johansson I, Andrei M, Nehler T, Thollander P. Barriers to and drivers of energy management in swedish smes. Energies 2021;14:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14216925.